A good proposal from Kamala Harris (and a lazy justification)

Reading Time:

Harris and others want to put an end to electronic (paperless) voting for federal offices:

The status quo is something you would design if your sole objective was trust-reduction. Dan Gillmor writes that "[i]n some jurisdictions, voters use machines that create electronic tallies with no “paper trail”—that is, no tangible evidence whatsoever that the voter’s choices were honored. A “recount” in such places means asking the machine whether it was right the first time."

The system can, assuming a reasonable set of reforms, become more robust to human error, technological glitches, or bad-faith moves by domestic or foreign actors and groups in either the official or private sector.

Yes, a tweet has a character limit, but selling the proposal by acting as if there is just one reason (THE reason, in the tweet above) for paper ballots, while disseminating fear of one middle-income country is... perhaps not necessary.

Degrees and courses in Data Science

A year ago, I saw this announcement in the Harvard Yard:Observed in the habitat earlier today: pic.twitter.com/PCMUJOXQcE— Jan Zilinsky (@janzilinsky) August...

Popular TV personalities in 2006

The Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES) survey asked respondents to rate various personalities, so you could run some models to see whether people's cultural tastes are...